• ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Objection!

    You can use fishes for multiple species however it is not required. You can use fish for a collection of trout and bass

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Person/People does. The word “peoples” can be used as multiple different groups of people.

      For instance you can say to “the peoples of Europe” to refer to Germans, French, Italian, etc.

      • wieson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But people is a non-countable word, like water. You don’t have one people, two people.

        When talking about peoples of [place] it’s a countable word.

        Fish is countable.

        • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          People are countable. That’s the whole point of a census. Water can come in any amount, such as 3.5 litres. People come in discrete numbers. You can’t have .5 of a person.

          I think the thing confusing you is that it’s one of those weird English words where the singular and plural word are different. Person/people vs car/cars.

          • Pyro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can still say “waters” though. For example: “The waters of Amsterdam” would collectively refer to all bodies of water in Amsterdam. Another example I came across online was “Don’t forget your waters” which referred to multiple bottles of water.

      • BluesF@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hmmm. I’m just going to keep using this to refer to all my I’ll gotten gains.

    • sik0fewl@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Uncountable nouns (i.e.,things you usually measure by volume or weight) behave this way as well.

      e.g., salt/salts to mean any measure of salt vs different types of salts. Beer/beers to mean any amount of liquid beer vs different beer styles or products.

  • BluesF@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Of course anyone who hears this is likely to just think you’re an idiot.

  • TheDrunkard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a good thing that English isn’t actually defined by any one person or entity, and simply by its usage. That means this is bullshit.

    • Jesse@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      As you say in your first sentence, language is by consensus. And, the long-standing consensus among ichthyologists is to use exactly this terminology, and you’ll find it consistently across the scientific literature for generations now.

  • pythonoob@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t care if the person is technically correct or not, any time I hear ‘fishes’ I cringe.